Claims tie-back
“A pipe failed. Were we there, and was it us?”
Places a subcontractor 7 m from the reported point two years earlier, working outside their locate ticket, with a bore 6 inches under spec.
Every card below runs the actual engine against the actual inputs and prints what it printed — no recordings, no mock-ups. Where the inputs are synthetic they say so, and where an engine refuses to answer, the refusal is the output. The first group is the point: those answers come out of the close-out capture itself, with nothing extra collected.
From the capture, with nothing new collected
These read the records close-out already created. No extra visit, no extra form, nothing asked of a crew that is not already being asked.
synthetic data, real shape
The rule sets behind these are our best reading of AT&T’s requirements, not their published spec. Ansco’s own rejection history is what sets where the line actually falls — it calibrates the judgement, it does not create it.